NO TRACKING? NO PROBLEM!

March 10th, 2011

Replacing “Cyberstalk” Marketing With Real Relationships

Have you ever visited a website (maybe even for the first time) and automatically saw ads for products or services in which you’re interested? Were you even a little bit creeped out?

Web-visitor tracking is a favorite tool for many major marketers using analytics programs to custom-tailor targeted advertising.

But the visitor-tracking train is about to be derailed.

Privacy advocates and willing web-browser manufacturers are crippling the ability of marketers to track activity. They propose putting technology in the end-users’ hands to stop ad targeting based on individual web use. The movement is known as “Do Not Track.”

The Federal Trade Commission is pushing web-wide Do Not Track initiatives. Senator John Kerry and House Representative Ed Markey are promising to introduce bills that would limit tracking. Microsoft’s Internet Explorer 9 (IE9) includes a powerful Do Not Track function. Nonprofit developer Mozilla is touting a Do Not Track feature for its Firefox browser.

We say “good riddance to tracking!”

The death of visitor tracking could be a boon for the proven, relationship-based Social Media Marketing methods we’ve been championing.

I won’t go into the digital dynamics of Social Media Marketing vs. Traditional practices, here. That horse is being beaten elsewhere, all over the web. We all realize that actually engaging an audience is more work than simply finding them and telling them what’s for sale and why they should buy it from you. But engagement has become the must-do, modern marketing model and consumers expect it.

Not only do they expect it, they are talking to each other about it on Social Media sites. Savvy marketers will be part of the conversation, not just “peeking in” to measure metrics, insights and analytics.

Effective Social Media Marketing is based on relationships and is inherently permission based. A little time spent customizing privacy settings, removing posts, “de-friending” and flagging can ensure you only interact with those with whom you choose. Not doing so is like complaining about a TV show with the remote in your hand.

Our simplified Social Media Marketing services for retailers, restaurants and other small-to-medium size businesses are based on four basic principles of effective communication;

1. Engagement

2. Interaction

3. Content

And one most-often absent these days,

4. Courtesy

The process usually starts with voluntary-list, branded emails with loads of links to engaging content and an “opt-out” button. Speaking of email, there has been some chatter about Facebook and Twitter replacing email. But, have you ever considered how your Social Media profiles are registered? They’re all linked to your email address. Email is still the standard for unique online identification, making it ideal for low-cost, voluntary direct contact.

So, bring on Do Not Track. We know a better way.

Thanks!

IT’S HIP TO BE SQUARE

February 16th, 2011

Designing New Logos for Facebook Business Pages

As our Social Media Services flourish, I have looked at and “Liked” several hundred new Facebook Business pages.

I keep a keen eye on the logos. Experienced marketers know a company’s logo or “mark” is a most valuable brand asset. The logo “brands” your particular product or service in the mind of consumers.

Many logos in the Facebook page Canvas (that 197-pixel-wide field in the upper left corner) are way too tiny and are often overwhelmed by the rest of the page’s graphic elements.

Most of these “lost” logos are of horizontal or rectangular orientation.

Some may have been designed back in the good old analog days, when major considerations were application on letterheads, envelopes, business cards, signs, packaging and such.

But remember, Facebook was originally conceived to showcase college student’s FACES. Faces fit well in square boxes. Unless you’re that dude from the Lemonhead® candy package.

So what to do when putting a rectangular logo in a square box?

If you can’t figure out a way around a “lost” logo in the Canvas area, you should consider making your logo as prominent as possible on your Facebook Business Page’s Landing Page. You do have a custom Landing Page, don’t you? Every Business Page should.

Savvy designers, like ours, will always make your rectangular logo work in the square space.

Professionally designed logos usually include use guidelines that prohibit altering graphic and textual logo elements. For example, you’re not likely to see the world’s most recognized brand, Coca-Cola® with one word stacked on the other and without the hyphen, just to make it a square. But notice how they incorporate other graphic components, like an illustration of the distinctively shaped bottle, around the logo (never invading a given amount of free space around the logo) for maximum flexibility of use.

Our company’s logo, designed nearly eight years ago, is rectangular. For Social Media pages, we incorporated the photo we took of a fifth generation Chevrolet Camaro. The car’s menacing fascia and glowing halo headlamp add a touch of intrigue, without overwhelming the logo and diluting the brand. It’s also fitting, as we are long-time members of SEMA, the Automotive Aftermarket Industry association.

But unlike AdTex Advertising, many of the companies coming on the Social Media scene are fresh start-ups. For these companies, it is advantageous to go ahead and design new logos with Facebook pages in mind and make them square.

Need experienced guidance with your new brand and Social Media Marketing efforts? I know a great little company that can help you with that.

YOUR COMPANY IS ON FACEBOOK. NOW WHAT?

December 23rd, 2010

Now that our Social Media “3M” Services are gaining traction, I’m surprised how many companies have Facebook “Like” pages but haven’t a strategy in place to benefit from the marketing exposure.

With over half a billion users, a Facebook business page has understandably become a must-have strategy for any size company. But many business pages are nothing more than a “virtual wall”, covered with “graffiti. Others are a redundant duplication of the company’s website, like a “digital brochure” to tell potential customers about the company’s offerings. In a recent blog post, I likened some of these efforts to “no more than ‘digital pamphlets’ that “are gathering dust, stacked at the virtual receptionist’s desk but aren’t being “distributed”.

Both of these strategies are wasteful underachievement and failure to harness the interactive power of the Social Media platform.

In another article I noted how a company’s Facebook page “should be more of a ‘hangout’ for the portion of the half-billion Facebook users that has an interest in your company, product or services.” See the article here.

THIS IS HOW WE DO IT

Here’s how we help companies launch their Facebook initiatives.

1. If necessary, we create the new page, with the best apps (tabs) required for the client’s marketing strategy. We recommend custom FBML (Facebook Markup Language) landing tabs, with an incentive (see #2, below) to “Like” the page, not just view it. We’re not big fans of “Reveal” tabs, but grasp the concept.

2. We work with the client on an interactive digital strategy for growing their “Likerbase” (I like to think we coined that word). Most of our retail customers already have an email or direct-mail list.

3. We produce and distribute attention-grabbing, link-laden HTML emails to introduce customers to the new and/or improved FB page. We urge the clients to “incentivize” the opt-ins with offers for new Facebook Likers. These incentives include dollars-off, percent-off, BOGOs, sweepstakes, weekly giveaways and other offers exclusively for “Likers”. We add an opt-in tab to the Facebook page and encourage the client to do the same for their website.

4. We make sure there is engaging content on the page for the inaugural “Likers. The idea is to keep browsing-happy “Likers” on your page as long as possible, with your brand’s mark (logo) in that upper left corner, burning into their conscious and subconscious. This content includes videos, photos, games, trivia, polls, personal features of officers/employees, discussions and more. We include links to other sites and pages, but try not to make them as prominent. That lessens the likelihood of “Likers” quickly navigating away from the client’s page.

5. Next we again engage the “Likers” with interesting “Wall” posts. Best practices include addressing posters by name, customer appreciation, soliciting feedback, apologizing for less-than-satisfactory customer experiences and initiating discussions (we feel these are most effective on the “Wall” and not at the “Discussions” tab). This is where our “3M” service come into play. We Monitor the page every four hours, six days a week for posts that need addressing or brand-damaging spam. We “Mediate” any negative posts and we Maintain the page by removing old and/or irrelevant posts and updating events and applications.

6. We look for or create linkbacks to the client’s page for optimization.

Times are tough and we’ve observed a tendency for companies to take a “Do-It-Yourself” approach to building and managing a Facebook page. As a matter of fact, at least one of our potential clients has tried to pick clean our collective brains about our process in order to get around paying us and doing it themselves. But many small-to-medium size companies are discovering that doing it right is a full-time job. The employee (who has a personal profile and “knows Facebook”) that handles the page “on the side” may not have the time or even know how to effectively produce engaging advertising.

I saw a great little company on Facebook that can economically handle that for you!

YOUR WEBSITE ISN’T EXACTLY YOUR BEST ADVERTISING

November 23rd, 2010

As I prepare to exit what I call “Advertising for a Living”, I’m making what I hope are my last few cold calls. Many of these calls are to small and midsize businesses.

As you can imagine, I’m getting quite a few “Dear Johns”.

One noticeable trend observed during the rejection, is the tendency of many of the marketing decision-makers at these businesses to believe that their website and Social Media efforts are the only advertising they need!

I get lots of “I’m ‘good’, man. We already have a website and a Facebook page.”

I borrow a line from the film Field of Dreams, when I label this as “If We Build It, They Will Come” marketing.

I guess with all the rage about “digital” advertising, some don’t realize that websites and Facebook pages, though relatively cost-effective, are PASSIVE ADVERTISING mediums. Customers must be driven to them, by some means.

These means include search engine queries (now generically called “googling”), surprisingly strong YouTube searches, “direct” (email or even direct mail), mobile marketing, event marketing (trade shows, publicity events, etc.), press releases and old-school stand-bys like outdoor, R.O.P., catalogs, broadcast, word of mouth and even handbills. I believe this is the practice that gave birth to the buzzword “interactive”. All of these methods “interact” to boost your brand’s exposure.

So many small-to-medium-size business websites are no more than “digital pamphlets”. They are gathering dust, stacked at the virtual receptionist’s desk but aren’t being “distributed”.

With technology and unemployment spawning millions of new competitors in so many markets, it’s ever more imperative that marketers realize that Search Engine Optimization and Social Media Optimization are not the only effective tools to reach their target customer. Plus, even the highest-ranking sites and pages are ineffective without strong content.


WHAT DOES CONTENT CONTAIN?

Recently, we were providing our Social Media “3M” services for a local restaurateur. He has over 20 years of successful experience in the food and beverage business and like many others, fancies himself a capable do-it-yourself marketer. So, he DIYed the website for one of his establishments, a pizza joint. The site was what some in my circle call a “Hot Mess”, or more appropriately, a “HTML Mess”! It had one photo of a single dish and a jumbled mess of words on two or three ill-designed pages. The owner thought it was effective because it had what he felt was all the pertinent info, the Facebook and Twitter logos and plenty of bogus “Italian” lingo.

After convincing him of the need for a pro-built, optimized site, the owner contracted another great agency, with which we’re now associated, to build one. He provided the developer with all he thought they needed, including the menu, the hours of operation, the location and other text-based information. When the developer asked him to provide some “content”, he had no idea of what she spoke. Instead of asking her, he asked me. I took the opportunity (which in hindsight, I should have invoiced him for) to tell him that “content” included the three types of critical elements for an engaging site;

1. Textual (which he had covered)
2. Visual (videos, photos and links to more of each)
3. Aural (sound)

I told him this all is what used to be called “media”

I likened his efforts to have only textual content to watching his favorite TV show with only words on the screen. Imagine, let’s say, Three and a Half Men, with only static text of Charlie, Alan and Jake’s witty banter on the screen — no video, live sound or music.

Good, professionally-produced content is essential for engaging your audience in any medium.

We’re calling on another local restaurant client. He is one of the founders of what might be the Southwest’s fastest growing regional food franchise. They are hot! The corporate Facebook “Like” page has tens of thousands of “Likers”. The “wall” is full of mostly positive posts from fans. There is no interaction from the page administrators. On the day I first chose to view their page, near the top of the wall was a disparaging post from a young man who was apparently unhappy with the fare. He crudely likened it to bodily waste. The post was generously peppered with language that would make Rod Blagojevich blush. The post had been there for ten days. There were several more such posts on the first page, including one in which the alleged customer mentions contracting food poisoning after a meal there. The page was loaded with several spam posts, too.

I contacted the chain’s co-founder, pointed out the brand-damaging posts and offered our low-cost, “3M” services. I mentioned that although their wall posts are overwhelmingly positive, tens of thousands of other “Likers” shouldn’t have been exposed to that vulgar, negative post for nearly two weeks. But I figured the page is likely handled by one of the restaurant’s employees or executives. It’s probably a person with many other duties, that ‘does the Facebook thing on the side.”

I also complimented the apparent strength of the restaurant’s brand and the robust “Liker” interaction on the page. We believe the most effective Facebook pages aren’t those on which the owner spends an inordinate amount of time telling the “Likers” about what’s for sale. The best pages are more of a “virtual hangout” for the portion of Facebook’s ever growing, half a billion users that are interested in your product or service. The longer the “Likers” “hang out” at your place, the more they’re exposed to your brand,

The key to keeping them there longer is engaging content.

The key to getting more people to see that content is interactivity. If you want more brand exposure, don’t just rely on a great website or a Facebook page, (just for the sake of being on Facebook) that’s just sitting out there, unattended and covered with graffiti, in cyberspace.

Hire an experienced, professional marketing company to produce/update your content and implement cost-effective strategies to drive customers to your web and social media sites.

I know of a real good one.

I AM NOT AN INFIDEL!

August 9th, 2010

Thoughts on “freelancing”.

In the past and occasionally here lately, I tend to “hire out” my skills in trade. That trade is advertising copywriting.

During those times, I have been called a “freelancer” and I don’t particularly cotton to it!

I prefer “independent contractor”, “outside representative”, “consultant”, or even contract laborer”.

By it’s very definition, the word freelancer conveys a sense of disloyalty and infidelity. Among a certain crowd, “freelancer” has such a negative connotation. Plus, the reciprocal nature of the inherent freedom in freelancing isn’t often considered.

Please allow me to explain.

My research of the word, which admittedly wasn’t exhaustive, reveals that it is derived from the medieval term “free lance”. A free lance was a mercenary knight whose lance or sword was not sworn to a particular king or lord. It’s sort of like “hired gun” in the westerns.

I understand the term “free lance” was used way back in Sir Walter Scott’s 1819 novel, Ivanhoe.

The implications is that these roving soldiers of fortune were only in it for the money and their loyalties lay only with the highest current bidder.

Sometimes “freelance” is even used synonymously with “rogue”.

Is that how I’m viewed when I take a temporary/hourly or per-page gig?

Well, I beg to differ!

Once under contract (whether written or implied) I would like to think I am certainly dedicated to carrying out the terms of the agreement between the client and I. Like nearly any full-time employee (except for those with military commitments and the like). I also have the option of terminating the agreement, walking away and forfeiting contingent compensation. The client has the same option and many are mighty quick on the trigger to exercise it, with little or no advance notice.

Curiously, the freelancer label has been most-often linked to creative professionals; “freelance graphic artist”, “freelance copywriter”, freelance journalist”.

Also the noun “free lance” has morphed into common use as an adjective (“a freelance artist”), a verb (“a writer who freelances”) and an adverb (“he worked freelance there”).

The client/freelancer relationship is characterized by the lack of long-term commitment. Sound familiar? “DJ, we love your writing style and your penchant for alliteration. But, frankly, we want the freedom to see other writers.” Ever hear that “see others” line in an amorous relationship? It’s usually the relationship’s death knell. It reeks of “Infidelity” and “Playing the Field”.

Well, two can play that game!

The key is absence of exclusivity. Which is understood in this type of relationship. A client often doesn’t have as much invested into the freelancer — no benefits, no training costs, no guaranteed seat at the office Christmas party, etc. Thus, there is no real commitment. The advantage afforded both parties is flexibility. A full-time staffer isn’t likely to let the employer push their payday back even 24 hours. Whereas my “freelance” experiences often involved my 30-day-net invoice finally being paid after 45-50 days…often only partially, then. It’s the nature of the business.

Don’t get me wrong…and please take my observations in the tongue-in-cheek spirit intended. Mostly it was an opportunity to share with my peers, the history of the word. Most of my past freelance gigs were profitable, fruitful and even educational. Freelancing has helped me establish lasting relationships with people who have proven beneficial to our business. But remember, as a local auto dealer says in his radio ads (commenting on his vehicle inventory), “I ain’t married to none of ‘em!”

SOCIAL MEET YA [sic]

July 7th, 2010

Facebook is not the real world.

Some may disagree with that assertion and many are so addicted to the site, they are in denial about the possibility of it being true.

Personally, I am determined, even in the “Social Media” age, to lead a full social and business life that isn’t dependent on my Internet connection.

I have uncles, aunts, cousins, nieces and nephews I haven’t seen in at least a year. Most of us live in the same metropolitan area, so I won’t be passing up opportunities to see them to chat with a so-called “Facebook Family”.

As I near a half-decade of social existence, my circle of actual friends has been pared down to a faithful few. The associate and acquaintance count has significantly diminished also. Opportunities to visit with them are too rare to spend an inordinate amount of time interacting with “Facebook Friends”.

I don’t have a real farm, but do live on a little acreage, I have never “farmed” on Facebook, but don’t think I would find it nearly as rewarding as getting outdoors and doing some real gardening. I’ve always been fascinated by tales of organized crime. But my idea of fun tilts more toward heading out to the garage and working on a gangster-looking early 40s street rod, than battling Mafioso on my computer. I’m not knocking anyone’s pastimes…heck many find mine downright boring…I’m just extolling the virtues of getting away from that computer screen for some fresh air.

I’m blessed to lead a relatively quiet life with plenty of spiritual fullness, fun, true friendships and a magnificent woman with which to share it all. But even before Social Media and owning a “smart phone”, I had no desire to write my beliefs, passing thoughts, hopes, disappointments, etc. on a public “wall”. I studied “Radio/TV” in college, nearly 30 years ago. My first jobs were at TV stations. But I really never thought of “broadcasting” my life to strangers, associates and acquaintances. But maybe all that is generational. My generation’s impressionable years were before all these so-called “reality shows”. Please see my thoughts on the “People Are Sheep” post.

Many of my 500+ Facebook connections are friends, associates and acquaintances. I try to limit connections to only those folks I truly know. I figure about two thirds of my Facebook connections would recognize my voice (which isn’t particularly distinctive) if I called them on the phone and didn’t immediately identify myself. They include childhood pals, high school and college classmates, former co-workers and others.

I have been in communications/advertising/marketing over half my life. I have seen a few trends, innovations and evolutions in the field.

Maybe that’s why I’m not all atwitter (pun intended) about Social Media.

Though no expert, I do indeed grasp the concept, scope and impact of the Social Media phenomenon. We have Facebook, Twitter, Flickr, YouTube and LinkedIn accounts, and of course, this blog.

I realize that to be successful in most any kind of business, one must have a certain Social Media presence. I see the growing number of business “Like” pages. I wish we had more “Likers” on our FB page.

But, I am of the mind that you still can’t beat old-fashioned, face-to-face communications (with the old standby phone calls running a close second).

Aren’t the aforementioned SM tools just very convenient mediums for reaching others worldwide? To me, when the rubber meets the road, it’s still about effective communication. Poor communication is just as ineffective digitally as via any other medium…maybe even more so.

Who wouldn’t be impressed by a long-distance communications method for almost instantaneously sending and receiving short messages? The message-length limitations even spawned a creative code system for abbreviated words and phrases. Twitter? No, Samuel Morse’s Electric Telegraph and Morse Code language from the 1840s. Okay techheads, I understand the advancements in wireless technology and handheld devices. But, we’re talking basic communications, here.

For best conveying a message, telegraph, telephone, two-way radio, email, smart phones and even video teleconferencing will never replace the emotion, voice inflection, eye movement and even the sincerity of a handshake (which, being a bit mysophobic, I believe should be universally replaced by fist bumps, “wrist shakes” or even “man hugs”).

I also grasp the concept of convenience and practicality. Poking at that little screen on my iPhone to tell a potential new client “Lets meet to do biz” may be more convenient than fewer strokes to dial the number, exchanging pleasantries with the receptionist and saying “Hi, this is D.J. When’s the best time for us to come by, listen to your plans and discuss how we can help make them happen and earn your business?” But the latter is just ”me”.

Those are the kind of clients I want most to deal with. That’s why I have implemented what I call my “Exit Strategy From Advertising for a Living.” God be willing, approximately two years from now, my current vocation will be the hobby that helps grow my new career. This new path will find me on the road, providing a tangible product to like-minded customers who will expect to meet me, exchange that fist bump and buy the great, unique product I’ll be peddling. The venture will involve social media, e-commerce fulfillment and wireless/digital technology. But meeting me and getting to know my character will be the key element in the business relationships. If you’re curious about that venture, I’ll be glad to tell you more. Email me, text me or send me a Twitter or Facebook message.

Better still, call me at 817.244.5054. I look forward to speaking with you.

True Evolution vs. Buzzwords and Bandwagons

December 29th, 2009

Our great little advertising company is at a crossroads. I’m seeing so much info that suggests that the “advertising” tag has become taboo.

Should we “re-brand”?

Everything’s all “branding”, “interactive”, “synergies” and “Paradigms” now. When I ask some industry vets what it all means, I often get varying and contradictory answers.

I grew up nurturing a curious fascination with animals and wildlife. So, I fully understand that evolution is necessary to stave off extinction. I know the same is true in business. But, in this age of “information overload”, I wonder how much of the new marketing buzz is bogus?

A popular poster from the 70s comes to mind. It read something like “If you can’t dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bull…”.

AM I WADING IN THE LA BREA TAR PITS OF MARKETING?

To prove that our desire has never been to become business fossils, here are some callouts from some of my previous blog entries;

From “Keep Doing What You’ve Always Done…”:

“…we embrace and utilize technology,…”

“Our services must be relevant and viable. For, at least a couple of prospects have proven so by ripping off our ideas.”

From “Lost in the Maze of Modern Marketing…”:

“We do embrace business evolution and technology.”

“It seems the more I look at the latest trends and requisite buzzwords (ie; “interstitial”, “RFM”, “metrics”, “pay per click”, “SEO”, “social media”, “micro-blogging”, clickthrough, “branding”, et. al.), the more I long for simpler times.”

“Is there a less-convoluted way to tell prospective clients about beneficial services at a reasonable cost?”

“We don’t want to reinvent ourselves. For, I truly feel our “run-lean/hard-work/low-overhead/under-promise and over-deliver” business model is still relevant. But something’s gotta’ change.”

From “People Are Sheep”:

“…our “old-fashioned”, print-based services are still valuable, viable and effective. Especially when integrated with digital mediums.”

Again, I don’t doubt the value of all the new business models out there. Plus, I fully grasp the impact the Internet has had on retailing and how advertising has subsequently evolved.

CHANGE IS INEVITABLE

I also know if I’m suffering from a midnight toothache, I won’t find a 24-hour apothecary with an Internet search. They’re now called drugstores.

If I were a manufacturer of phone booths, I surely would have seen the cell phone’s rise as a call to re-tool and make something else. Maybe steel furniture for the front of Starbucks stores or something.

If I were Andrew Ridgeley, I would have invested some of that “Wake Me Up Before You Go-Go” money in prime real estate. (Google that and get back with me, young folks).

MERE WORDPLAY?

But to me, the aforementioned scenarios involve real changes, not trendy semantics.

A “honed-edge portable slicing device” is still just a pocket knife.

A “Manually operated, elongated terrain repositioner” is just a fancy name for a shovel.

A “biological bovine methane emission device” is …you figure that one out.

Technological advances may change the method, but not necessarily the medium. Though produced by computerized sensors, “digital images” are still just photographs or pictures. They’re just not made by emulsified silver, suspended on paper or plastic. (Wonder if Eastman Kodak really saw that one coming?)

THANKS, BUT NO THANKS

The point is, I think we’re gonna’ sit this one out.

To some, it sounds risky. But there is method to our “madness”. Call it “Counter-Culture Positioning”. How ‘bout those buzzwords?

If we have always integrated our clients’ advertising across mediums like web, print, broadcast, outdoor (and recently “social” media), do we really need to toss all our existing business cards, stationery and brochures for new ones with the word “interactive” all over them?

If we have always offered to develop clients’ corporate identities on multiple levels, do we really need to replace “advertising” with “branding”?

THE SECOND OLDEST PROFESSION?

In a past Biblical studies series, I explored the history of Greco-Roman prostitution and fertility rituals during the so-called New Testament times. The prostitutes that often operated in places like the Temple of Artemis at Ephesus must have been quite proficient at “branding”. Their clothing, makeup and perfumes were carefully designed to attract the wealthiest clients. The most successful proprietors needed a “brand” that set them apart. I imagine the competition was fierce. The situation might have been what compelled the Apostle Paul to urge Godly women to dress in a manner that distinctly set them apart from the temple prostitutes. (1 Timothy 2:9)

If prostitution is indeed the oldest profession, could advertising be the second oldest?

Earlier, in the same collection of inspired writings, the wisest man of the times said that there is nothing new under the sun (Ecclesiastes 1:9-10).

I tend to agree with wise old King Solomon.

SWIMMING UPSTREAM ‘CAUSE THERE ARE TOO MANY FISH DOWNSTREAM

Cyberspace is chock full of agencies that are scrambling for “relevance” by loading up on coveted keywords. There are so many “new experts” in the “digital” field. Blogs and other online portals have created millions of new commentators, columnists and consultants. There is enough new research out there to prove anyone’s particular point, both pro and con.

The result of all this might be a disproportionate number of clients for all the providers of these services.

So, as we make a shift from a primary focus on print work to Digital content, we’re still going to apply age-old, proven principles like engagement, persuasion, brevity and repetition to get your message to customers.

We’re also going to continue to seek a few good clients who expect outstanding customer service. They also need, know and appreciate proven, effective and economical advertising.

Call it “interactive”, call it “branding”, call it whatever is popular these days. But, please CALL US. We’re ready to listen to your marketing plans, goals and challenges. Then, we’ll produce sales-driving advertising and place it wherever you need it.

Lost in the Maze of Modern Marketing or “What Would Paladin Do?”

July 8th, 2009

Our little company is facing the mighty challenge of redirecting our own marketing efforts in these trying times. We don’t want to reinvent ourselves. For, I truly feel our “run-lean/hard-work/low-overhead/under-promise and over-deliver” business model is still relevant. But something’s gotta’ change.

It seems the more I look at the latest trends and requisite buzzwords (ie; “interstitial”, “RFM”, “metrics”, “pay per click”, “SEO”, “social media”, “micro-blogging”, clickthrough, “branding”, et. al.), the more I long for simpler times.

Is there a less-convoluted way to tell prospective clients about beneficial services at a reasonable cost? Gee, I long for some old-time simplicity.

When all else fails, I can rely on my fictional business role model, Paladin.

Quick story: In my former Advertising Manager position at the big manufacturer, we were always facing impossible deadlines and logistical challenges. One particular project found us at crunch time to deliver millions of printed inserts by a fast-approaching bindery cut-off date. Between fast-paced strategy sessions with our trusted designers, the printers and even the freight line, I had to take time speak with the concerned rep. at the 3rd –party bindery. He seemed skeptical of my promise of an on-time delivery. Later, he told my assistant (now our VP) “That D.J. dude has the demeanor of a gunfighter”.

Yes, I have culled many of my best business practices from traits of the late, great Richard Boone’s character from the 50s TV western Have Gun—Will Travel.

For those unfamiliar with the series, I’ll share what I recall and can gather from my Complete First Season DVD collection liner notes.

Have Gun—Will Travel ran on CBS from 1957 to 1963. It was the lead-in show for the long-running Gunsmoke. The central character was a sometimes-enigmatic gunfighter for hire, who called himself Paladin (by definition, a paragon of chivalry and/or heroic champion). Actually, Paladin fancied himself more of a “troubleshooting consultant” than a mere gunfighter. Between “freelance gigs”, he was a nattily attired ladies man about town and noted resident of The Hotel Carlton in San Francisco. He kept his skills honed and did the dirty work to finance his high style of living, taste for fine cuisine, beverages and cigars. Paladin’s rate for services was $1000 a day, plus expenses. Boy, what we would do to be making that…here some 100 years later.

When working, Paladin would shed his frilly city duds and ride out, dressed in ominous basic black. He was a lightning-fast draw with uncanny accuracy and a flair for words. He was just as adept in a bloody fistfight as he was quoting Shakespeare, Shelley or Socrates. He was chivalric and had a unique code of honor, even in a lawless environment.

Simple Marketing Strategy and Branding to Boot

Paladin had a straightforward plan for finding work. He would search for someone with a problem and offer himself as the solution. Paladin would have the hotel’s porter bring him a stack of newspapers from territories near and far. He would look for articles about someone with a particular problem. Maybe it was a mine owner being overrun by outlaws. It might have been a lopsidedly violent land dispute. It could be a blatant want ad for a fast gun. Either way, Paladin would clip the article and send it to the prospective client, along with his card. Oh, that iconic card. It was eventually featured in a tight camera shot during every episode. There was always an accompanying dramatic musical riff. The card was also immortalized in singer Johnny Western’s (what a great name) theme as “The Card of a Man”. It was a simple, period-standard “calling card” with the only artwork being a stark, black silhouette of a chess knight. A silver chess night adorned Paladin’s black holster. It was his distinctive “Brand”, I guess. The card had only these words” “Have Gun—Will Travel” and “Wire Paladin” “San Francisco”.

What a pitch! You have a pressing problem and a virtual stranger offers an effective solution in the form of a simple card with a chess piece printed on it and a few words. It worked well for 50s-60s TV fiction, but what about today? If the American West were still untamed, would there be scores of gunfighter/problem-solvers out there? Would they be paying consultants to search-engine optimize their websites so a besieged mine owner could find them? Would they hire marketing firms to provide advanced demographic and psychoanalytical research on frontier peoples?

Or would a strong man (or company) with a reliable reputation and good references get the job done?

Oh, for a simpler time. But alas, I know it’s not to be. We do embrace business evolution and technology. But I also do believe the strategy is solid and the principles therein are effective. I regularly scour the trades and newspapers for articles about changes or moves at companies for which our services are a fit. I then try to send some form of attention-getting correspondence offering our services as a cost-effective solution. I then follow up with a phone call.

I guess the big difference is our reputation doesn’t always precede us. We were well known and have great references in the home-textiles and department-store world. But cold calling often presents us as just another little agency in a vast sea of them.

Given the chance, we will again prove our mettle and carve a new niche’ in another field. Our new clients will certainly benefit from our experience and cost-saving operations. That’s a benefit of running lean without all the latest trends and tricks.

Not Always the Best, But Outstanding in the Field

Paladin was very good at his trade. He also studied the competition to assess their weakness in relationship to his strengths. He adjusted his position accordingly. In one episode, he conquered a cobra-fast opponent with his slightly slower draw and impeccably placed hip shot. While clutching a resulting flesh wound, Paladin had these words for any other possible opponents in the hostile crowd. “Fast, but not accurate. Anybody figure he can do better?”

Our services are not a perfect fit for all clients. We know that some larger operations will eat us alive with low-ball quotes, We also know the limitations of our resources and never bite off more than can be chewed.

That’s why we specialize in certain programs and position ourselves as an “add-on” service, to boost client’s bottom lines, incrementally.

Unfortunately many prospects immediately dismiss us because they “already have someone who does that” without even listening to what we do and how it works.

You Have to Be Versatile

When asked about the silver knight on his holster, Paladin told someone “It’s a chess piece, the most versatile one on the board. It can move in eight different directions, over obstacles and it’s always unexpected.”

Back in the days when we were annually producing and delivering over 300 million print inserts, I would encourage our “troops” to diversify and develop cross-platform skills. My mantra was “AdTex isn’t a one-trick pony”. Our creative partners are some of the most skilled designers, artists, photographers, videographers, printers, copywriters and project managers around. That skill and versatility is handy when scrambling for piecework in times like these. When things turn around globally, we hope to have kept our “chops” up for the next trusted client.

Know Your Tools, Keep Them Working Well and Have an “Ace in the Hole”

When working, Paladin’s best friend was his sidearm. It was a smooth, black single-action .44 cal revolver with a rifled barrel. He practiced drawing and shooting it with both hands. The .44 was a precision handcrafted piece with a 1-oz. trigger pull. Paladin really hated to hear “Drop that gun!” I think it wasn’t so much that an opponent had the drop. It was likely the idea of his “livelihood” hitting the dirt. But, Paladin was usually always prepared for that scenario. In his waistband, was a little 2-shot derringer. The “stingy gun’s” sharp report was often the last sound Paladin’s enemies heard.

Our “tools” aren’t necessarily our Macintosh computers, software, high-resolution digital cameras, large-format color laser printers or gigantic web presses. Those are all means to the end. But our most-trusted tools are our minds. Even during slow times like these, we’re doing projects to keep our creativity rolling. I’m a copywriter by trade. Although my abilities might have been slightly dulled by nearly 15 years of executive-level project management, I take every opportunity to write some retail copy. If nothing else breaks loose soon, our creative minds are still our vocational “derringers”. We keep ‘em clean and ready.

The “Paladin Principles”

So what have I learned from Have Gun—Will Travel and how do I apply it now and in the future?

1. Work hard and stay sharp.
2. Don’t wait for work to come to us. Find it and make us the answer to clients’ questions.
3. Stay current and relevant.
4. Be fast and accurate.
5. Know our strengths and acknowledge any weaknesses.
6. Be versatile.
7. Be honorable and honest, even when business can be dirty.
8. Stay cool under fire.
9. Keep our brand consistent.

Now, where are those dailies? We need some work!

HAVE WE BEEN HOODWINKED OUT OF OUR JOBS?

April 21st, 2009

I’m no economist or financial historian. I’ve often been accused of oversimplifying complex situations. So, with those two disclaimers out of the way, please consider my humble layman’s assessment of the current state of the job market and overall lack of work for companies like ours.

Personally, I believe we have been bamboozled out of our jobs! We’ve been hornswoggled right out of work!

The cause: someone convinced us that America should not manufacture anything.

Maybe the ever-present mainstream media, helped us buy into the notion that the “new economy” will be based solely on concepts like “intellectual property”, owning licensing rights, “content”, stock and the belief that everyone can make a good living by the Internet.

Was it not apparent to anyone in charge that the nation’s commerce system depends upon us making stuff for domestic consumption and to sell to other countries? Am I again “oversimplifying” things when I think that a gargantuan trade deficit might be due to one party not manufacturing enough product to sell to other parties? Is there some underlying dynamic that I am not intellectually qualified to grasp?

Did anyone stop to consider that eliminating American manufacturing would in effect eliminate an entire social class? Do you think it’s that same endangered social class of which we heard so much during last year’s political campaigns?

Why wasn’t this situation deemed a “crisis” before it was an election platform?

I’ve also been accused of hating the “world’s largest retailer”. I think most misunderstand my principal-based refusal to shop at the behemoth “big box” store and my accompanying soapbox pontifications on the subject. The point I have been trying to make for about a dozen years is simply that I believe the long-term effect the retailer’s business model has on the country is an adverse one.

I always hear “But they have the lowest prices.” My answer is usually something like, “Yeah, but years from now, it won’t matter how low the prices are. We won’t have jobs to make money to buy any of the foreign-sourced stuff they’re peddling.”

I believe that those low prices are made possible only by the disproportionately low salaries the foreign workers are paid and the lack of so many stifling governmental restrictions imposed upon domestic manufacturers. But, I could be mistaken.

I have mentioned both the “lack of work for companies like ours” and “manufacturing” above. Many may see “Advertising” in our company’s name and think we’re the type of agency that gets paid big bucks just to sit around, brainstorming up the next “cutting edge”, witty creative campaign to sell to some deep-pocketed client. That just ain’t AdTex Advertising. It’s not who we are. We’re more like the hard-working, “front-end feeders” for an old-fashioned, print-based manufacturing operation. Our income (still virtually non-existent, by the way) is predicated on those house-size web presses running at our print partner’s Midwest location. The creative process represents a substantially small percentage of client cost. That’s why we keep overhead so low and run so lean. That’s why our total service package is so economical.

Our history is actually in Home Textiles Manufacturing (see the “LDB” article here), an industry, which I hear, is nearly extinct domestically. We were the in-house advertising department for the premiere American manufacturer of bedding and bath products. Some great towels, sheets and comforters were made right here in the US of A by hard-working, relatively low-paid, taxpaying citizens. I wonder if more of those tax dollars could have been used to save their jobs. It seems the reciprocal effect would have a substantial upside — more workers continuing to work and pay more taxes.

BAILED RIGHT OUT OF WORK

The frustration with this situation recently hit the fan with my print partner, Mike. I believe the final straw was flipping to the backside of an American Automobile Manufacturer’s car brochure where he discovered “Printed in South Korea” in the small print. Mike works for a great, family-owned, 121-year old Visual Communications (read “printing”) company based in the same state as the “Big Three” auto manufacturers. He took his outrage to local lawmakers, where he got someone’s ear. He filled that ear with an informed and organized rant about his displeasure with having taxpayer “bailout” dollars appropriated for what was effectively the elimination of his job. He detailed his assertion that if our lawmakers would work to ease the financial burden of meeting the stringent standards to which our government demands, his company would be more than competitive. He’s sure that with a “leveled playing field”, the foreign printers couldn’t touch his prices. Mike challenged the lawmakers to tour his company’s facilities. He also invited them to bring their children along and pull samples of anything on the presses at any time. He assured them they would never find any smut or questionable material, just superior-quality American manufacturing.

I guess I’m just old fashioned. (That was likely apparent when the younger readers pulled up Wikipedia to find “hornswoggled” or Googled “bamboozled” and the older ones grabbed their Funk & Wagnall to check my spelling). I still subscribe to and read the daily newspaper. A recent edition (Sunday, April 19, 2009) of the local daily included a Parade magazine article entitled “What’s Made in the USA”. It stated that “America still produces more goods than any other country — $1.6 trillion worth, according to the federal Bureau of Economic Analysis. It says that “America currently accounts for 20% of all manufacturing output.”

Maybe we’re also the most automated and efficient manufacturer on the planet. Is that where the massive job losses happened? The article also mentioned some analysts’ predictions that “China will soon overtake the U.S. as the world’s leading producer.” The article never mentioned which countries are the largest consumers. Also note that the Parade magazine article was less than a half page, including a chart showing “What We Make”, “What It’s Worth” and “Whom It Employs”. A preceding article on “What is Royalty in the 21st Century” took two full pages. More fascination with foreign countries! (that’s one of those tongue-in-cheek jokes, ya’ll).

I close how I opened, saying I’m no economist/historian and I tend to oversimplify complex situations.

That’s why I look forward to your feedback. (Notice how this blog entry is riddled with questions?) I’ve always been one to learn by asking.

Maybe you’re an economist, scholar or have exhaustively researched the situation. Then you can enlighten a simple, old-fashioned advertising “manufacturing” guy about where more income is generated when we’re not manufacturing enough desirable products for someone, somewhere to buy. Then let me know who runs the equipment to manufacture them.

PEOPLE ARE SHEEP

January 30th, 2009

I once learned a great marketing lesson from a very unlikely source. A good friend, John (now deceased) owned a luxury suite at Texas Motor Speedway. After enjoying a NASCAR Sprint Cup race, John and I left the suite for a fresh-air break. High above the speedway, the breezeway has these narrow little horizontal windows overlooking the parking area. We were leaning on the wall, watching thousands of cars attempting to exit the parking lot.

Note that a NASCAR Cup race at TMS seems to always draw the facility’s estimated 212,400-person capacity (approx. 138,100 seats plus infield spectators, RVs and fans in the suites). There are approximately 80,300 parking spaces.

We were watching at least 10,000 cars attempting to exit a parking lot. The portion we were watching has about four exits. But all of the cars were clogging a single exit.

Now John, though smart, wasn’t an introspective kind of guy. But, after a few moments of observing the goings on below, he noted that, “People are sheep.”

“What?” I asked.

“People are sheep.”, he repeated.

“Look at all those cars, trying to squeeze out that one exit. One car went there and all the others mindlessly followed. The other three exits are empty.”

“Sheep.”

Now, I’m supposed to be the big thinker, here. Maybe that’s why I felt the need to respond with some sage wisdom of my own.

“John, we’re up higher. We can see the other exits. Maybe they couldn’t.”

I made my point. But John’s point really stuck with me.

Those TV reality shows come to mind. The number of them is ridiculous. Eclipsed only by the absurdity of some of the premises. I understand that they’re cheap to produce (compared to half-hour sitcoms and hour-long dramas), and thus plentiful. The concept has been around for ages — think Candid Camera, This is Your Life and the original American Gladiators. But it seems that once an excessive amount of deception, backstabbing and conniving was added to the recipe, they took off and spawned one crazy program after another.

The apparent result of another stroke of marketing brilliance was the relatively sudden proliferation of “Sports Utility Vehicles”. What sport? I’ll concede the “utility” in some cases. You see, Chevrolet’s Carryall-Surburban debuted around 1935 and was quite the utilitarian vehicle. But the trend did not explode until some 50 years later. I have been called peculiar and told I look at things from a perspective unlike the rest of the world. If I would have lapsed into a coma as a child and emerged from it in the 90s, one of my first questions would have been “Why are all the station wagons so tall?”

But, back to the “Sheep” principle: Maybe that’s why we work so hard to convince anyone that will listen that our “old-fashioned” approach to good marketing is still valuable, viable and effective. Especially when integrated with digital mediums. Many marketers are like the driver of that second car to go to that single exit. They saw someone go that way and figured it is the only way to go. Then everyone else got in line behind them, leaving the other ways undiscovered.

We’re trying hard to show some new client another (not necessarily overwhelmingly better) way.

We’ll have to show them that way from a “higher perspective”.