Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

YOUR COMPANY IS ON FACEBOOK. NOW WHAT?

Thursday, December 23rd, 2010

Now that our Social Media “3M” Services are gaining traction, I’m surprised how many companies have Facebook “Like” pages but haven’t a strategy in place to benefit from the marketing exposure.

With over half a billion users, a Facebook business page has understandably become a must-have strategy for any size company. But many business pages are nothing more than a “virtual wall”, covered with “graffiti. Others are a redundant duplication of the company’s website, like a “digital brochure” to tell potential customers about the company’s offerings. In a recent blog post, I likened some of these efforts to “no more than ‘digital pamphlets’ that “are gathering dust, stacked at the virtual receptionist’s desk but aren’t being “distributed”.

Both of these strategies are wasteful underachievement and failure to harness the interactive power of the Social Media platform.

In another article I noted how a company’s Facebook page “should be more of a ‘hangout’ for the portion of the half-billion Facebook users that has an interest in your company, product or services.” See the article here.

THIS IS HOW WE DO IT

Here’s how we help companies launch their Facebook initiatives.

1. If necessary, we create the new page, with the best apps (tabs) required for the client’s marketing strategy. We recommend custom FBML (Facebook Markup Language) landing tabs, with an incentive (see #2, below) to “Like” the page, not just view it. We’re not big fans of “Reveal” tabs, but grasp the concept.

2. We work with the client on an interactive digital strategy for growing their “Likerbase” (I like to think we coined that word). Most of our retail customers already have an email or direct-mail list.

3. We produce and distribute attention-grabbing, link-laden HTML emails to introduce customers to the new and/or improved FB page. We urge the clients to “incentivize” the opt-ins with offers for new Facebook Likers. These incentives include dollars-off, percent-off, BOGOs, sweepstakes, weekly giveaways and other offers exclusively for “Likers”. We add an opt-in tab to the Facebook page and encourage the client to do the same for their website.

4. We make sure there is engaging content on the page for the inaugural “Likers. The idea is to keep browsing-happy “Likers” on your page as long as possible, with your brand’s mark (logo) in that upper left corner, burning into their conscious and subconscious. This content includes videos, photos, games, trivia, polls, personal features of officers/employees, discussions and more. We include links to other sites and pages, but try not to make them as prominent. That lessens the likelihood of “Likers” quickly navigating away from the client’s page.

5. Next we again engage the “Likers” with interesting “Wall” posts. Best practices include addressing posters by name, customer appreciation, soliciting feedback, apologizing for less-than-satisfactory customer experiences and initiating discussions (we feel these are most effective on the “Wall” and not at the “Discussions” tab). This is where our “3M” service come into play. We Monitor the page every four hours, six days a week for posts that need addressing or brand-damaging spam. We “Mediate” any negative posts and we Maintain the page by removing old and/or irrelevant posts and updating events and applications.

6. We look for or create linkbacks to the client’s page for optimization.

Times are tough and we’ve observed a tendency for companies to take a “Do-It-Yourself” approach to building and managing a Facebook page. As a matter of fact, at least one of our potential clients has tried to pick clean our collective brains about our process in order to get around paying us and doing it themselves. But many small-to-medium size companies are discovering that doing it right is a full-time job. The employee (who has a personal profile and “knows Facebook”) that handles the page “on the side” may not have the time or even know how to effectively produce engaging advertising.

I saw a great little company on Facebook that can economically handle that for you!

YOUR WEBSITE ISN’T EXACTLY YOUR BEST ADVERTISING

Tuesday, November 23rd, 2010

As I prepare to exit what I call “Advertising for a Living”, I’m making what I hope are my last few cold calls. Many of these calls are to small and midsize businesses.

As you can imagine, I’m getting quite a few “Dear Johns”.

One noticeable trend observed during the rejection, is the tendency of many of the marketing decision-makers at these businesses to believe that their website and Social Media efforts are the only advertising they need!

I get lots of “I’m ‘good’, man. We already have a website and a Facebook page.”

I borrow a line from the film Field of Dreams, when I label this as “If We Build It, They Will Come” marketing.

I guess with all the rage about “digital” advertising, some don’t realize that websites and Facebook pages, though relatively cost-effective, are PASSIVE ADVERTISING mediums. Customers must be driven to them, by some means.

These means include search engine queries (now generically called “googling”), surprisingly strong YouTube searches, “direct” (email or even direct mail), mobile marketing, event marketing (trade shows, publicity events, etc.), press releases and old-school stand-bys like outdoor, R.O.P., catalogs, broadcast, word of mouth and even handbills. I believe this is the practice that gave birth to the buzzword “interactive”. All of these methods “interact” to boost your brand’s exposure.

So many small-to-medium-size business websites are no more than “digital pamphlets”. They are gathering dust, stacked at the virtual receptionist’s desk but aren’t being “distributed”.

With technology and unemployment spawning millions of new competitors in so many markets, it’s ever more imperative that marketers realize that Search Engine Optimization and Social Media Optimization are not the only effective tools to reach their target customer. Plus, even the highest-ranking sites and pages are ineffective without strong content.


WHAT DOES CONTENT CONTAIN?

Recently, we were providing our Social Media “3M” services for a local restaurateur. He has over 20 years of successful experience in the food and beverage business and like many others, fancies himself a capable do-it-yourself marketer. So, he DIYed the website for one of his establishments, a pizza joint. The site was what some in my circle call a “Hot Mess”, or more appropriately, a “HTML Mess”! It had one photo of a single dish and a jumbled mess of words on two or three ill-designed pages. The owner thought it was effective because it had what he felt was all the pertinent info, the Facebook and Twitter logos and plenty of bogus “Italian” lingo.

After convincing him of the need for a pro-built, optimized site, the owner contracted another great agency, with which we’re now associated, to build one. He provided the developer with all he thought they needed, including the menu, the hours of operation, the location and other text-based information. When the developer asked him to provide some “content”, he had no idea of what she spoke. Instead of asking her, he asked me. I took the opportunity (which in hindsight, I should have invoiced him for) to tell him that “content” included the three types of critical elements for an engaging site;

1. Textual (which he had covered)
2. Visual (videos, photos and links to more of each)
3. Aural (sound)

I told him this all is what used to be called “media”

I likened his efforts to have only textual content to watching his favorite TV show with only words on the screen. Imagine, let’s say, Three and a Half Men, with only static text of Charlie, Alan and Jake’s witty banter on the screen — no video, live sound or music.

Good, professionally-produced content is essential for engaging your audience in any medium.

We’re calling on another local restaurant client. He is one of the founders of what might be the Southwest’s fastest growing regional food franchise. They are hot! The corporate Facebook “Like” page has tens of thousands of “Likers”. The “wall” is full of mostly positive posts from fans. There is no interaction from the page administrators. On the day I first chose to view their page, near the top of the wall was a disparaging post from a young man who was apparently unhappy with the fare. He crudely likened it to bodily waste. The post was generously peppered with language that would make Rod Blagojevich blush. The post had been there for ten days. There were several more such posts on the first page, including one in which the alleged customer mentions contracting food poisoning after a meal there. The page was loaded with several spam posts, too.

I contacted the chain’s co-founder, pointed out the brand-damaging posts and offered our low-cost, “3M” services. I mentioned that although their wall posts are overwhelmingly positive, tens of thousands of other “Likers” shouldn’t have been exposed to that vulgar, negative post for nearly two weeks. But I figured the page is likely handled by one of the restaurant’s employees or executives. It’s probably a person with many other duties, that ‘does the Facebook thing on the side.”

I also complimented the apparent strength of the restaurant’s brand and the robust “Liker” interaction on the page. We believe the most effective Facebook pages aren’t those on which the owner spends an inordinate amount of time telling the “Likers” about what’s for sale. The best pages are more of a “virtual hangout” for the portion of Facebook’s ever growing, half a billion users that are interested in your product or service. The longer the “Likers” “hang out” at your place, the more they’re exposed to your brand,

The key to keeping them there longer is engaging content.

The key to getting more people to see that content is interactivity. If you want more brand exposure, don’t just rely on a great website or a Facebook page, (just for the sake of being on Facebook) that’s just sitting out there, unattended and covered with graffiti, in cyberspace.

Hire an experienced, professional marketing company to produce/update your content and implement cost-effective strategies to drive customers to your web and social media sites.

I know of a real good one.

I AM NOT AN INFIDEL!

Monday, August 9th, 2010

Thoughts on “freelancing”.

In the past and occasionally here lately, I tend to “hire out” my skills in trade. That trade is advertising copywriting.

During those times, I have been called a “freelancer” and I don’t particularly cotton to it!

I prefer “independent contractor”, “outside representative”, “consultant”, or even contract laborer”.

By it’s very definition, the word freelancer conveys a sense of disloyalty and infidelity. Among a certain crowd, “freelancer” has such a negative connotation. Plus, the reciprocal nature of the inherent freedom in freelancing isn’t often considered.

Please allow me to explain.

My research of the word, which admittedly wasn’t exhaustive, reveals that it is derived from the medieval term “free lance”. A free lance was a mercenary knight whose lance or sword was not sworn to a particular king or lord. It’s sort of like “hired gun” in the westerns.

I understand the term “free lance” was used way back in Sir Walter Scott’s 1819 novel, Ivanhoe.

The implications is that these roving soldiers of fortune were only in it for the money and their loyalties lay only with the highest current bidder.

Sometimes “freelance” is even used synonymously with “rogue”.

Is that how I’m viewed when I take a temporary/hourly or per-page gig?

Well, I beg to differ!

Once under contract (whether written or implied) I would like to think I am certainly dedicated to carrying out the terms of the agreement between the client and I. Like nearly any full-time employee (except for those with military commitments and the like). I also have the option of terminating the agreement, walking away and forfeiting contingent compensation. The client has the same option and many are mighty quick on the trigger to exercise it, with little or no advance notice.

Curiously, the freelancer label has been most-often linked to creative professionals; “freelance graphic artist”, “freelance copywriter”, freelance journalist”.

Also the noun “free lance” has morphed into common use as an adjective (“a freelance artist”), a verb (“a writer who freelances”) and an adverb (“he worked freelance there”).

The client/freelancer relationship is characterized by the lack of long-term commitment. Sound familiar? “DJ, we love your writing style and your penchant for alliteration. But, frankly, we want the freedom to see other writers.” Ever hear that “see others” line in an amorous relationship? It’s usually the relationship’s death knell. It reeks of “Infidelity” and “Playing the Field”.

Well, two can play that game!

The key is absence of exclusivity. Which is understood in this type of relationship. A client often doesn’t have as much invested into the freelancer — no benefits, no training costs, no guaranteed seat at the office Christmas party, etc. Thus, there is no real commitment. The advantage afforded both parties is flexibility. A full-time staffer isn’t likely to let the employer push their payday back even 24 hours. Whereas my “freelance” experiences often involved my 30-day-net invoice finally being paid after 45-50 days…often only partially, then. It’s the nature of the business.

Don’t get me wrong…and please take my observations in the tongue-in-cheek spirit intended. Mostly it was an opportunity to share with my peers, the history of the word. Most of my past freelance gigs were profitable, fruitful and even educational. Freelancing has helped me establish lasting relationships with people who have proven beneficial to our business. But remember, as a local auto dealer says in his radio ads (commenting on his vehicle inventory), “I ain’t married to none of ‘em!”

SOCIAL MEET YA [sic]

Wednesday, July 7th, 2010

Facebook is not the real world.

Some may disagree with that assertion and many are so addicted to the site, they are in denial about the possibility of it being true.

Personally, I am determined, even in the “Social Media” age, to lead a full social and business life that isn’t dependent on my Internet connection.

I have uncles, aunts, cousins, nieces and nephews I haven’t seen in at least a year. Most of us live in the same metropolitan area, so I won’t be passing up opportunities to see them to chat with a so-called “Facebook Family”.

As I near a half-decade of social existence, my circle of actual friends has been pared down to a faithful few. The associate and acquaintance count has significantly diminished also. Opportunities to visit with them are too rare to spend an inordinate amount of time interacting with “Facebook Friends”.

I don’t have a real farm, but do live on a little acreage, I have never “farmed” on Facebook, but don’t think I would find it nearly as rewarding as getting outdoors and doing some real gardening. I’ve always been fascinated by tales of organized crime. But my idea of fun tilts more toward heading out to the garage and working on a gangster-looking early 40s street rod, than battling Mafioso on my computer. I’m not knocking anyone’s pastimes…heck many find mine downright boring…I’m just extolling the virtues of getting away from that computer screen for some fresh air.

I’m blessed to lead a relatively quiet life with plenty of spiritual fullness, fun, true friendships and a magnificent woman with which to share it all. But even before Social Media and owning a “smart phone”, I had no desire to write my beliefs, passing thoughts, hopes, disappointments, etc. on a public “wall”. I studied “Radio/TV” in college, nearly 30 years ago. My first jobs were at TV stations. But I really never thought of “broadcasting” my life to strangers, associates and acquaintances. But maybe all that is generational. My generation’s impressionable years were before all these so-called “reality shows”. Please see my thoughts on the “People Are Sheep” post.

Many of my 500+ Facebook connections are friends, associates and acquaintances. I try to limit connections to only those folks I truly know. I figure about two thirds of my Facebook connections would recognize my voice (which isn’t particularly distinctive) if I called them on the phone and didn’t immediately identify myself. They include childhood pals, high school and college classmates, former co-workers and others.

I have been in communications/advertising/marketing over half my life. I have seen a few trends, innovations and evolutions in the field.

Maybe that’s why I’m not all atwitter (pun intended) about Social Media.

Though no expert, I do indeed grasp the concept, scope and impact of the Social Media phenomenon. We have Facebook, Twitter, Flickr, YouTube and LinkedIn accounts, and of course, this blog.

I realize that to be successful in most any kind of business, one must have a certain Social Media presence. I see the growing number of business “Like” pages. I wish we had more “Likers” on our FB page.

But, I am of the mind that you still can’t beat old-fashioned, face-to-face communications (with the old standby phone calls running a close second).

Aren’t the aforementioned SM tools just very convenient mediums for reaching others worldwide? To me, when the rubber meets the road, it’s still about effective communication. Poor communication is just as ineffective digitally as via any other medium…maybe even more so.

Who wouldn’t be impressed by a long-distance communications method for almost instantaneously sending and receiving short messages? The message-length limitations even spawned a creative code system for abbreviated words and phrases. Twitter? No, Samuel Morse’s Electric Telegraph and Morse Code language from the 1840s. Okay techheads, I understand the advancements in wireless technology and handheld devices. But, we’re talking basic communications, here.

For best conveying a message, telegraph, telephone, two-way radio, email, smart phones and even video teleconferencing will never replace the emotion, voice inflection, eye movement and even the sincerity of a handshake (which, being a bit mysophobic, I believe should be universally replaced by fist bumps, “wrist shakes” or even “man hugs”).

I also grasp the concept of convenience and practicality. Poking at that little screen on my iPhone to tell a potential new client “Lets meet to do biz” may be more convenient than fewer strokes to dial the number, exchanging pleasantries with the receptionist and saying “Hi, this is D.J. When’s the best time for us to come by, listen to your plans and discuss how we can help make them happen and earn your business?” But the latter is just ”me”.

Those are the kind of clients I want most to deal with. That’s why I have implemented what I call my “Exit Strategy From Advertising for a Living.” God be willing, approximately two years from now, my current vocation will be the hobby that helps grow my new career. This new path will find me on the road, providing a tangible product to like-minded customers who will expect to meet me, exchange that fist bump and buy the great, unique product I’ll be peddling. The venture will involve social media, e-commerce fulfillment and wireless/digital technology. But meeting me and getting to know my character will be the key element in the business relationships. If you’re curious about that venture, I’ll be glad to tell you more. Email me, text me or send me a Twitter or Facebook message.

Better still, call me at 817.244.5054. I look forward to speaking with you.

True Evolution vs. Buzzwords and Bandwagons

Tuesday, December 29th, 2009

Our great little advertising company is at a crossroads. I’m seeing so much info that suggests that the “advertising” tag has become taboo.

Should we “re-brand”?

Everything’s all “branding”, “interactive”, “synergies” and “Paradigms” now. When I ask some industry vets what it all means, I often get varying and contradictory answers.

I grew up nurturing a curious fascination with animals and wildlife. So, I fully understand that evolution is necessary to stave off extinction. I know the same is true in business. But, in this age of “information overload”, I wonder how much of the new marketing buzz is bogus?

A popular poster from the 70s comes to mind. It read something like “If you can’t dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bull…”.

AM I WADING IN THE LA BREA TAR PITS OF MARKETING?

To prove that our desire has never been to become business fossils, here are some callouts from some of my previous blog entries;

From “Keep Doing What You’ve Always Done…”:

“…we embrace and utilize technology,…”

“Our services must be relevant and viable. For, at least a couple of prospects have proven so by ripping off our ideas.”

From “Lost in the Maze of Modern Marketing…”:

“We do embrace business evolution and technology.”

“It seems the more I look at the latest trends and requisite buzzwords (ie; “interstitial”, “RFM”, “metrics”, “pay per click”, “SEO”, “social media”, “micro-blogging”, clickthrough, “branding”, et. al.), the more I long for simpler times.”

“Is there a less-convoluted way to tell prospective clients about beneficial services at a reasonable cost?”

“We don’t want to reinvent ourselves. For, I truly feel our “run-lean/hard-work/low-overhead/under-promise and over-deliver” business model is still relevant. But something’s gotta’ change.”

From “People Are Sheep”:

“…our “old-fashioned”, print-based services are still valuable, viable and effective. Especially when integrated with digital mediums.”

Again, I don’t doubt the value of all the new business models out there. Plus, I fully grasp the impact the Internet has had on retailing and how advertising has subsequently evolved.

CHANGE IS INEVITABLE

I also know if I’m suffering from a midnight toothache, I won’t find a 24-hour apothecary with an Internet search. They’re now called drugstores.

If I were a manufacturer of phone booths, I surely would have seen the cell phone’s rise as a call to re-tool and make something else. Maybe steel furniture for the front of Starbucks stores or something.

If I were Andrew Ridgeley, I would have invested some of that “Wake Me Up Before You Go-Go” money in prime real estate. (Google that and get back with me, young folks).

MERE WORDPLAY?

But to me, the aforementioned scenarios involve real changes, not trendy semantics.

A “honed-edge portable slicing device” is still just a pocket knife.

A “Manually operated, elongated terrain repositioner” is just a fancy name for a shovel.

A “biological bovine methane emission device” is …you figure that one out.

Technological advances may change the method, but not necessarily the medium. Though produced by computerized sensors, “digital images” are still just photographs or pictures. They’re just not made by emulsified silver, suspended on paper or plastic. (Wonder if Eastman Kodak really saw that one coming?)

THANKS, BUT NO THANKS

The point is, I think we’re gonna’ sit this one out.

To some, it sounds risky. But there is method to our “madness”. Call it “Counter-Culture Positioning”. How ‘bout those buzzwords?

If we have always integrated our clients’ advertising across mediums like web, print, broadcast, outdoor (and recently “social” media), do we really need to toss all our existing business cards, stationery and brochures for new ones with the word “interactive” all over them?

If we have always offered to develop clients’ corporate identities on multiple levels, do we really need to replace “advertising” with “branding”?

THE SECOND OLDEST PROFESSION?

In a past Biblical studies series, I explored the history of Greco-Roman prostitution and fertility rituals during the so-called New Testament times. The prostitutes that often operated in places like the Temple of Artemis at Ephesus must have been quite proficient at “branding”. Their clothing, makeup and perfumes were carefully designed to attract the wealthiest clients. The most successful proprietors needed a “brand” that set them apart. I imagine the competition was fierce. The situation might have been what compelled the Apostle Paul to urge Godly women to dress in a manner that distinctly set them apart from the temple prostitutes. (1 Timothy 2:9)

If prostitution is indeed the oldest profession, could advertising be the second oldest?

Earlier, in the same collection of inspired writings, the wisest man of the times said that there is nothing new under the sun (Ecclesiastes 1:9-10).

I tend to agree with wise old King Solomon.

SWIMMING UPSTREAM ‘CAUSE THERE ARE TOO MANY FISH DOWNSTREAM

Cyberspace is chock full of agencies that are scrambling for “relevance” by loading up on coveted keywords. There are so many “new experts” in the “digital” field. Blogs and other online portals have created millions of new commentators, columnists and consultants. There is enough new research out there to prove anyone’s particular point, both pro and con.

The result of all this might be a disproportionate number of clients for all the providers of these services.

So, as we make a shift from a primary focus on print work to Digital content, we’re still going to apply age-old, proven principles like engagement, persuasion, brevity and repetition to get your message to customers.

We’re also going to continue to seek a few good clients who expect outstanding customer service. They also need, know and appreciate proven, effective and economical advertising.

Call it “interactive”, call it “branding”, call it whatever is popular these days. But, please CALL US. We’re ready to listen to your marketing plans, goals and challenges. Then, we’ll produce sales-driving advertising and place it wherever you need it.

Lost in the Maze of Modern Marketing or “What Would Paladin Do?”

Wednesday, July 8th, 2009

Our little company is facing the mighty challenge of redirecting our own marketing efforts in these trying times. We don’t want to reinvent ourselves. For, I truly feel our “run-lean/hard-work/low-overhead/under-promise and over-deliver” business model is still relevant. But something’s gotta’ change.

It seems the more I look at the latest trends and requisite buzzwords (ie; “interstitial”, “RFM”, “metrics”, “pay per click”, “SEO”, “social media”, “micro-blogging”, clickthrough, “branding”, et. al.), the more I long for simpler times.

Is there a less-convoluted way to tell prospective clients about beneficial services at a reasonable cost? Gee, I long for some old-time simplicity.

When all else fails, I can rely on my fictional business role model, Paladin.

Quick story: In my former Advertising Manager position at the big manufacturer, we were always facing impossible deadlines and logistical challenges. One particular project found us at crunch time to deliver millions of printed inserts by a fast-approaching bindery cut-off date. Between fast-paced strategy sessions with our trusted designers, the printers and even the freight line, I had to take time speak with the concerned rep. at the 3rd –party bindery. He seemed skeptical of my promise of an on-time delivery. Later, he told my assistant (now our VP) “That D.J. dude has the demeanor of a gunfighter”.

Yes, I have culled many of my best business practices from traits of the late, great Richard Boone’s character from the 50s TV western Have Gun—Will Travel.

For those unfamiliar with the series, I’ll share what I recall and can gather from my Complete First Season DVD collection liner notes.

Have Gun—Will Travel ran on CBS from 1957 to 1963. It was the lead-in show for the long-running Gunsmoke. The central character was a sometimes-enigmatic gunfighter for hire, who called himself Paladin (by definition, a paragon of chivalry and/or heroic champion). Actually, Paladin fancied himself more of a “troubleshooting consultant” than a mere gunfighter. Between “freelance gigs”, he was a nattily attired ladies man about town and noted resident of The Hotel Carlton in San Francisco. He kept his skills honed and did the dirty work to finance his high style of living, taste for fine cuisine, beverages and cigars. Paladin’s rate for services was $1000 a day, plus expenses. Boy, what we would do to be making that…here some 100 years later.

When working, Paladin would shed his frilly city duds and ride out, dressed in ominous basic black. He was a lightning-fast draw with uncanny accuracy and a flair for words. He was just as adept in a bloody fistfight as he was quoting Shakespeare, Shelley or Socrates. He was chivalric and had a unique code of honor, even in a lawless environment.

Simple Marketing Strategy and Branding to Boot

Paladin had a straightforward plan for finding work. He would search for someone with a problem and offer himself as the solution. Paladin would have the hotel’s porter bring him a stack of newspapers from territories near and far. He would look for articles about someone with a particular problem. Maybe it was a mine owner being overrun by outlaws. It might have been a lopsidedly violent land dispute. It could be a blatant want ad for a fast gun. Either way, Paladin would clip the article and send it to the prospective client, along with his card. Oh, that iconic card. It was eventually featured in a tight camera shot during every episode. There was always an accompanying dramatic musical riff. The card was also immortalized in singer Johnny Western’s (what a great name) theme as “The Card of a Man”. It was a simple, period-standard “calling card” with the only artwork being a stark, black silhouette of a chess knight. A silver chess night adorned Paladin’s black holster. It was his distinctive “Brand”, I guess. The card had only these words” “Have Gun—Will Travel” and “Wire Paladin” “San Francisco”.

What a pitch! You have a pressing problem and a virtual stranger offers an effective solution in the form of a simple card with a chess piece printed on it and a few words. It worked well for 50s-60s TV fiction, but what about today? If the American West were still untamed, would there be scores of gunfighter/problem-solvers out there? Would they be paying consultants to search-engine optimize their websites so a besieged mine owner could find them? Would they hire marketing firms to provide advanced demographic and psychoanalytical research on frontier peoples?

Or would a strong man (or company) with a reliable reputation and good references get the job done?

Oh, for a simpler time. But alas, I know it’s not to be. We do embrace business evolution and technology. But I also do believe the strategy is solid and the principles therein are effective. I regularly scour the trades and newspapers for articles about changes or moves at companies for which our services are a fit. I then try to send some form of attention-getting correspondence offering our services as a cost-effective solution. I then follow up with a phone call.

I guess the big difference is our reputation doesn’t always precede us. We were well known and have great references in the home-textiles and department-store world. But cold calling often presents us as just another little agency in a vast sea of them.

Given the chance, we will again prove our mettle and carve a new niche’ in another field. Our new clients will certainly benefit from our experience and cost-saving operations. That’s a benefit of running lean without all the latest trends and tricks.

Not Always the Best, But Outstanding in the Field

Paladin was very good at his trade. He also studied the competition to assess their weakness in relationship to his strengths. He adjusted his position accordingly. In one episode, he conquered a cobra-fast opponent with his slightly slower draw and impeccably placed hip shot. While clutching a resulting flesh wound, Paladin had these words for any other possible opponents in the hostile crowd. “Fast, but not accurate. Anybody figure he can do better?”

Our services are not a perfect fit for all clients. We know that some larger operations will eat us alive with low-ball quotes, We also know the limitations of our resources and never bite off more than can be chewed.

That’s why we specialize in certain programs and position ourselves as an “add-on” service, to boost client’s bottom lines, incrementally.

Unfortunately many prospects immediately dismiss us because they “already have someone who does that” without even listening to what we do and how it works.

You Have to Be Versatile

When asked about the silver knight on his holster, Paladin told someone “It’s a chess piece, the most versatile one on the board. It can move in eight different directions, over obstacles and it’s always unexpected.”

Back in the days when we were annually producing and delivering over 300 million print inserts, I would encourage our “troops” to diversify and develop cross-platform skills. My mantra was “AdTex isn’t a one-trick pony”. Our creative partners are some of the most skilled designers, artists, photographers, videographers, printers, copywriters and project managers around. That skill and versatility is handy when scrambling for piecework in times like these. When things turn around globally, we hope to have kept our “chops” up for the next trusted client.

Know Your Tools, Keep Them Working Well and Have an “Ace in the Hole”

When working, Paladin’s best friend was his sidearm. It was a smooth, black single-action .44 cal revolver with a rifled barrel. He practiced drawing and shooting it with both hands. The .44 was a precision handcrafted piece with a 1-oz. trigger pull. Paladin really hated to hear “Drop that gun!” I think it wasn’t so much that an opponent had the drop. It was likely the idea of his “livelihood” hitting the dirt. But, Paladin was usually always prepared for that scenario. In his waistband, was a little 2-shot derringer. The “stingy gun’s” sharp report was often the last sound Paladin’s enemies heard.

Our “tools” aren’t necessarily our Macintosh computers, software, high-resolution digital cameras, large-format color laser printers or gigantic web presses. Those are all means to the end. But our most-trusted tools are our minds. Even during slow times like these, we’re doing projects to keep our creativity rolling. I’m a copywriter by trade. Although my abilities might have been slightly dulled by nearly 15 years of executive-level project management, I take every opportunity to write some retail copy. If nothing else breaks loose soon, our creative minds are still our vocational “derringers”. We keep ‘em clean and ready.

The “Paladin Principles”

So what have I learned from Have Gun—Will Travel and how do I apply it now and in the future?

1. Work hard and stay sharp.
2. Don’t wait for work to come to us. Find it and make us the answer to clients’ questions.
3. Stay current and relevant.
4. Be fast and accurate.
5. Know our strengths and acknowledge any weaknesses.
6. Be versatile.
7. Be honorable and honest, even when business can be dirty.
8. Stay cool under fire.
9. Keep our brand consistent.

Now, where are those dailies? We need some work!

HAVE WE BEEN HOODWINKED OUT OF OUR JOBS?

Tuesday, April 21st, 2009

I’m no economist or financial historian. I’ve often been accused of oversimplifying complex situations. So, with those two disclaimers out of the way, please consider my humble layman’s assessment of the current state of the job market and overall lack of work for companies like ours.

Personally, I believe we have been bamboozled out of our jobs! We’ve been hornswoggled right out of work!

The cause: someone convinced us that America should not manufacture anything.

Maybe the ever-present mainstream media, helped us buy into the notion that the “new economy” will be based solely on concepts like “intellectual property”, owning licensing rights, “content”, stock and the belief that everyone can make a good living by the Internet.

Was it not apparent to anyone in charge that the nation’s commerce system depends upon us making stuff for domestic consumption and to sell to other countries? Am I again “oversimplifying” things when I think that a gargantuan trade deficit might be due to one party not manufacturing enough product to sell to other parties? Is there some underlying dynamic that I am not intellectually qualified to grasp?

Did anyone stop to consider that eliminating American manufacturing would in effect eliminate an entire social class? Do you think it’s that same endangered social class of which we heard so much during last year’s political campaigns?

Why wasn’t this situation deemed a “crisis” before it was an election platform?

I’ve also been accused of hating the “world’s largest retailer”. I think most misunderstand my principal-based refusal to shop at the behemoth “big box” store and my accompanying soapbox pontifications on the subject. The point I have been trying to make for about a dozen years is simply that I believe the long-term effect the retailer’s business model has on the country is an adverse one.

I always hear “But they have the lowest prices.” My answer is usually something like, “Yeah, but years from now, it won’t matter how low the prices are. We won’t have jobs to make money to buy any of the foreign-sourced stuff they’re peddling.”

I believe that those low prices are made possible only by the disproportionately low salaries the foreign workers are paid and the lack of so many stifling governmental restrictions imposed upon domestic manufacturers. But, I could be mistaken.

I have mentioned both the “lack of work for companies like ours” and “manufacturing” above. Many may see “Advertising” in our company’s name and think we’re the type of agency that gets paid big bucks just to sit around, brainstorming up the next “cutting edge”, witty creative campaign to sell to some deep-pocketed client. That just ain’t AdTex Advertising. It’s not who we are. We’re more like the hard-working, “front-end feeders” for an old-fashioned, print-based manufacturing operation. Our income (still virtually non-existent, by the way) is predicated on those house-size web presses running at our print partner’s Midwest location. The creative process represents a substantially small percentage of client cost. That’s why we keep overhead so low and run so lean. That’s why our total service package is so economical.

Our history is actually in Home Textiles Manufacturing (see the “LDB” article here), an industry, which I hear, is nearly extinct domestically. We were the in-house advertising department for the premiere American manufacturer of bedding and bath products. Some great towels, sheets and comforters were made right here in the US of A by hard-working, relatively low-paid, taxpaying citizens. I wonder if more of those tax dollars could have been used to save their jobs. It seems the reciprocal effect would have a substantial upside — more workers continuing to work and pay more taxes.

BAILED RIGHT OUT OF WORK

The frustration with this situation recently hit the fan with my print partner, Mike. I believe the final straw was flipping to the backside of an American Automobile Manufacturer’s car brochure where he discovered “Printed in South Korea” in the small print. Mike works for a great, family-owned, 121-year old Visual Communications (read “printing”) company based in the same state as the “Big Three” auto manufacturers. He took his outrage to local lawmakers, where he got someone’s ear. He filled that ear with an informed and organized rant about his displeasure with having taxpayer “bailout” dollars appropriated for what was effectively the elimination of his job. He detailed his assertion that if our lawmakers would work to ease the financial burden of meeting the stringent standards to which our government demands, his company would be more than competitive. He’s sure that with a “leveled playing field”, the foreign printers couldn’t touch his prices. Mike challenged the lawmakers to tour his company’s facilities. He also invited them to bring their children along and pull samples of anything on the presses at any time. He assured them they would never find any smut or questionable material, just superior-quality American manufacturing.

I guess I’m just old fashioned. (That was likely apparent when the younger readers pulled up Wikipedia to find “hornswoggled” or Googled “bamboozled” and the older ones grabbed their Funk & Wagnall to check my spelling). I still subscribe to and read the daily newspaper. A recent edition (Sunday, April 19, 2009) of the local daily included a Parade magazine article entitled “What’s Made in the USA”. It stated that “America still produces more goods than any other country — $1.6 trillion worth, according to the federal Bureau of Economic Analysis. It says that “America currently accounts for 20% of all manufacturing output.”

Maybe we’re also the most automated and efficient manufacturer on the planet. Is that where the massive job losses happened? The article also mentioned some analysts’ predictions that “China will soon overtake the U.S. as the world’s leading producer.” The article never mentioned which countries are the largest consumers. Also note that the Parade magazine article was less than a half page, including a chart showing “What We Make”, “What It’s Worth” and “Whom It Employs”. A preceding article on “What is Royalty in the 21st Century” took two full pages. More fascination with foreign countries! (that’s one of those tongue-in-cheek jokes, ya’ll).

I close how I opened, saying I’m no economist/historian and I tend to oversimplify complex situations.

That’s why I look forward to your feedback. (Notice how this blog entry is riddled with questions?) I’ve always been one to learn by asking.

Maybe you’re an economist, scholar or have exhaustively researched the situation. Then you can enlighten a simple, old-fashioned advertising “manufacturing” guy about where more income is generated when we’re not manufacturing enough desirable products for someone, somewhere to buy. Then let me know who runs the equipment to manufacture them.

PEOPLE ARE SHEEP

Friday, January 30th, 2009

I once learned a great marketing lesson from a very unlikely source. A good friend, John (now deceased) owned a luxury suite at Texas Motor Speedway. After enjoying a NASCAR Sprint Cup race, John and I left the suite for a fresh-air break. High above the speedway, the breezeway has these narrow little horizontal windows overlooking the parking area. We were leaning on the wall, watching thousands of cars attempting to exit the parking lot.

Note that a NASCAR Cup race at TMS seems to always draw the facility’s estimated 212,400-person capacity (approx. 138,100 seats plus infield spectators, RVs and fans in the suites). There are approximately 80,300 parking spaces.

We were watching at least 10,000 cars attempting to exit a parking lot. The portion we were watching has about four exits. But all of the cars were clogging a single exit.

Now John, though smart, wasn’t an introspective kind of guy. But, after a few moments of observing the goings on below, he noted that, “People are sheep.”

“What?” I asked.

“People are sheep.”, he repeated.

“Look at all those cars, trying to squeeze out that one exit. One car went there and all the others mindlessly followed. The other three exits are empty.”

“Sheep.”

Now, I’m supposed to be the big thinker, here. Maybe that’s why I felt the need to respond with some sage wisdom of my own.

“John, we’re up higher. We can see the other exits. Maybe they couldn’t.”

I made my point. But John’s point really stuck with me.

Those TV reality shows come to mind. The number of them is ridiculous. Eclipsed only by the absurdity of some of the premises. I understand that they’re cheap to produce (compared to half-hour sitcoms and hour-long dramas), and thus plentiful. The concept has been around for ages — think Candid Camera, This is Your Life and the original American Gladiators. But it seems that once an excessive amount of deception, backstabbing and conniving was added to the recipe, they took off and spawned one crazy program after another.

The apparent result of another stroke of marketing brilliance was the relatively sudden proliferation of “Sports Utility Vehicles”. What sport? I’ll concede the “utility” in some cases. You see, Chevrolet’s Carryall-Surburban debuted around 1935 and was quite the utilitarian vehicle. But the trend did not explode until some 50 years later. I have been called peculiar and told I look at things from a perspective unlike the rest of the world. If I would have lapsed into a coma as a child and emerged from it in the 90s, one of my first questions would have been “Why are all the station wagons so tall?”

But, back to the “Sheep” principle: Maybe that’s why we work so hard to convince anyone that will listen that our “old-fashioned” approach to good marketing is still valuable, viable and effective. Especially when integrated with digital mediums. Many marketers are like the driver of that second car to go to that single exit. They saw someone go that way and figured it is the only way to go. Then everyone else got in line behind them, leaving the other ways undiscovered.

We’re trying hard to show some new client another (not necessarily overwhelmingly better) way.

We’ll have to show them that way from a “higher perspective”.

KEEP DOING WHAT YOU’VE ALWAYS DONE AND YOU’LL KEEP GETTING WHAT YOU’VE ALWAYS GOT

Friday, December 19th, 2008

The grammatically unsound, yet catchy saying has been popular with African-American pastors for quite a while. They often use variations of it to motivate members to do more — more evangelizing, giving, ministry work, etc.

In over 25 years in the advertising/marketing/communications business, I have never seen a time when the warning entailed in the aforementioned catchphrase was so applicable to businesses and their marketing strategies.

These are indeed challenging times for so many companies. One would think that savvy marketers would be more receptive to some different ideas and strategies for thriving and survival. Maybe they would consider an extra “ace in the hole” for the battle ahead.

Not so, in the case of our company. My recent experiences (which are subjective and personal) show that even struggling companies are content to continue doing what they have always done. Even if what they’re getting is disappointing.

Please bear with me as I tell our story.

I run a little advertising agency that once did big work for some gigantic clients. Admittedly, we’re now struggling mightily. We believe that changes in our country’s international trade culture (namely foreign sourcing) are the underlying cause for our challenges. We had been successful in business for nearly a dozen years, when our customer base eroded. We’re seeking to “carve a new niche’” in other fields.

Our services are straightforward, economical and proven to be effective. Although we embrace and utilize technology, we’re an old-fashioned, hard-working, “brick-and-mortar” print agency. We’re no fly-by-night “cyber” operation or “virtual” agency. Our clients and associates from the past are ready to testify about our impeccable track record, enthusiastic work ethic and reputation for efficiency.

For the past three years we have directly contacted several hundred companies to openly pitch our wares. We have spent tens of thousands of marketing dollars on trade-publication ads. We developed an innovative and well-received (if not fruitful) direct-contact, incremental marketing campaign. We have done hundreds of mailouts with requisite follow-up phone calls. We have used the web, trade shows, press releases and other tools to build our brand.

All this effort has produced no significant advertising work, to date.

ONE MAN’S EXPERIENCE

Don’t get me wrong. This little discourse isn’t as much a rambling diatribe garnished with sour grapes as one man’s personal observation of the current business climate. We surely expected significant challenges in convincing prospective new clients to at least consider us. But some of our encounters with contacts have been marked by inexplicable hostility, vitriol, arrogance and even deceit.

Whether by business-hours calls, email (with advance notice, via phone), mail, delivery services, after-hours voicemails or office visits, all our correspondence was proper business-to-business communication. But the response was sometimes surprising. We identified our target contacts as Top Executive Decision Makers or TEDs.

I can understand those who did not even find the time to respond to our appeals. I guess if we have become so busy, we have to constantly hold phone conversations while driving, we certainly don’t have a few moments to chat with an “unsolicited vendor”. The responses that baffled me were from the TEDs that treated us like we were telemarketers calling them at home…at dinner time! They seemed to resent our having the unmitigated gall to even call on them. Their responses can be kind of mean spirited and amazingly personal. One TED seemed to take great pleasure in telling me “I wasn’t impressed by your stuff.” After further discussion, I realized he hadn’t even opened our package. I asked him about a distinctive element of the pitch and he had no idea of what I spoke. Why was he so quick to dismiss us?

A TED in the hospitality industry took our call as an affront to her in-house staff. Even after attempting to explain our “add-on-service” business model, she became increasingly surly. It was like I somehow implied that her “crack” staff wasn’t doing a good job. I certainly did nothing of the sort. I wonder why she was so touchy?

I’ve observed another interesting phenomenon. Some other contacts have taken a bit of time to talk with us. But they used nearly all of that time to dissuade and discourage us. Why?

I get many leads from reading trade publications. I recently saw an article in a Home Furnishings trade magazine. The article included an interview with the marketing TED of a major manufacturer. She mentioned seeking additional marketing tools (our “niche”) and outside agencies. “What a great fit!” I thought. In the past, we had done some super-successful print inserts that included her company’s products. I called for TED and was forwarded to her assistant. I quickly and cordially let the assistant know why I was calling. Although, I didn’t initially mention it, I had the trade article before me. I began a point-by-point illustration of how our services could boost her company’s bottom line. The assistant shot each point down like they were clay pigeons and she was the world’s best skeet shooter. With formidable force, she told me that they don’t do any of that stuff and if they did, their world-class in-house staff and big ‘ol agency of record would handle it. She said our chances of getting any work out of them were slim to none. Then she said something like “Just make that NONE!” As I began to slink away, with my tail securely tucked, I “turned” to make one last, feeble attempt to salvage any hope to be found. I softly mentioned that my call was prompted by the quotes in her boss’s interview. My proclamation was greeted by some deep sighs of frustration (while she valiantly fought the urge to hang up on me) as she begrudgingly suggested I send some info. She just had to qualify that suggestion with the fact that it too will be an exercise in futility.

I realize that part of her duty as a good assistant might include screening TED’s vendor calls. But is such thorough flogging part of the job description?

I find a quantum of solace in our struggles. Our services must be relevant and viable. For, at least a couple of prospects have proven so by ripping off our ideas. Unfortunately, the nature of our business requires us to produce comps or spec work. A few companies have expressed interest in our concepts and challenged us to show them how it’s done. I know the big agencies have legal contracts to help prevent unscrupulous companies from pirating their intellectual property during the brainstorming process. But, although we have dealt with gigantic companies, we pride ourselves in having the integrity to abide by the old-fashioned handshake agreement. We begin prospect relationships with a confidentiality agreement to assure our clients we value discretion with their information.

A couple of big companies found our Vertically Integrated Funded (VIF) Magalog concept intriguing. One retailer picked our collective brain for insight and went on to produce a bastardized in-house version of our Magalog concept. Their failure to implement some of the key elements likely resulted in the piece being a colossal flop.

A couple of years ago, a TED at a large Automotive-products manufacturer asked us to produce a comp of a VIF Magalog with their brands. During the development, I had regular conversations with TED. Once we submitted the work, I never heard back from him. I left voicemail messages, tried to have him paged and spoke with whoever would answer a phone for two months. There was no response. I understand TED is still with that company and in the same position. I wonder why I haven’t heard from him?

One of the most disheartening incidents involved a big resort out West. We had paid for costly annual stays there for ten years straight. We receive their direct-marketing mailers throughout the year. Before our eleventh annual stay, we pitched a comprehensive package to their TED, the Director or Marketing. We had hundreds of hours into comps for TED. The spec work included an innovative idea for their key-card holders, a magnificent digitally printed custom postcard/sweepstakes promotion with Personalized URLs (PURLs) and an occupancy-driving version of our print partner’s 6PAC mailer. After submission of the material, our TED at the resort went incommunicado also. On this year’s stay, our twelfth, I was greeted with an obvious altered version of our key-card holder idea. Later in the year, we received the closest thing they could produce to the patented 6PAC mailer.

I can imagine how this happened. The Marketing Director did let us know that she would review the concepts with her staff. I can imagine the conversation went something like “Yeah boss, that’s a great idea. But why send that money to Texas. We can change that up a little, design it in-house and have our friends at the local printer run ‘em.”

It was nonetheless a sickening experience. But maybe it’s all just a sign of the times and an indication of the current business climate.

LYING ON A NAIL

Another relevant tale I heard at my local church involved a fellow member, Willie. He visited a friend down in the Louisiana bayou. The friend’s home had one of those big, wood-slat porches. Willie says that he talked with the guy for hours out on the porch. He noticed that, during this entire time, his pal’s old hound dog was lying in a single spot, making a constant, low groaning sound. As the afternoon heat intensified, the pal invited Willie in the house to continue the visit. After a while, as he was leaving, Willie noticed the dog again. He was still in the same spot, still groaning. Willie asked his buddy, “Hey man, what’s wrong with your dog?” The friend said “That old dog’s lying on a nail.” “Why doesn’t he move off the nail?” Willie asked. The owner’s answer was “It doesn’t hurt him enough to get up and move, so I guess he just lays there and whines.”

Maybe that’s what we’re facing, too. Many businesses are willing to lie on the nail and groan about their situation. Our low-cost opportunity for them to rise up and move may fall on deaf ears. Maybe they’re just not hurting enough?

WE KNEW THE ROW WAS TOUGH WHEN WE CHOSE TO HOE IT

Now, I see the news and regularly read business publications. I understand that many marketing decision makers are often overworked, understaffed for assistance and overwhelmed by cold calls from wannabe vendors. Not too very long ago, I was one of them. In my last position as the Advertising Manager for a gigantic manufacturer, I sometime fielded up to 225 business-related phone calls, daily. Somehow, my name and work phone number ended up on contact lists for the print industry. My voicemail box seemed to always be filled with calls. Our 3-person department (with two or three outside creative contractors) produced over 300 jobs and nearly half a billion printed advertising pieces annually. Despite a tremendous workload, I made a point to return all phone calls by week’s end. This process usually took only a couple of hours a week. I did it after hours, when necessary. I never treated even the most persistent callers with disrespect, disdain or shortness. If our operations were not compatible with their company and programs, I politely told them so. I would usually invite them to send info about their services. The material wasn’t deposited in “File 13”, but actually placed in our “Vendor Info” file that was purged every five years or so.

Maybe what I deemed as simple, common courtesy could be labeled “Old School” inefficiency and an obsolete concept in today’s business climate. But I’m glad I applied yet another principal gleaned from the traditional African-American church. My late pastor used to say, “Be careful of whom you step over on your way up the ladder. You’re likely to see the same folks on the way down.”

Many of those same cold-calling vendors later provided significant work and solid leads after our staff at the now-defunct manufacturer formed our current company.

THE THING THAT WOULD NOT GO AWAY

True story: We call this the tale of “The Thing That Would Not Go Away”. At the manufacturing company, there was a time when we produced hundreds of millions of pieces of only a particular type of printed material. One afternoon, a gangly vendor rep. from upstate showed up. After somehow weaseling his way past the company receptionist and our department secretary he ended up in the advertising department. I invited him for some brief “face time”. He worked hard to convince me that his company’s mainstay product was an ideal and economical fit for us. After hearing his “pitch” for another kind of printed material, I informed him that we were not currently doing that stuff. I told him we could consider it for future programs and thanked him for his time. He asked had I had lunch? I hadn’t and he offered to buy. I was pretty busy and told the persistent Yankee that I wouldn’t be available until after quitting time. He offered to wait…there in my office! I called his “bluff” and sarcastically told him he could sit there and watch me work quietly for the next two or three hours. Then, we could maybe grab a quick bite and discuss his product. This guy actually sat in a not-so-comfortable office chair across from my desk for hours. He silently jotted down notes, while I busily worked the phones and computer. More than once, my boss called me out of my office and pointedly told me to “get rid of that greasy sales guy, now!”

I didn’t and the boss was later glad about it.

Months later, after much research, I added The Yankee’s services. I didn’t seek to replace our current vendor, but just chose to try something else too. Our purchasing executives were extremely put off when I invited The Yankee, along with the executives from our other print vendor to a simultaneous meeting. The purchasing VP told me, in no uncertain terms, that my plan simply was “not the way things were done”. But I ran the program and insisted on the meeting. I wanted to forego the standard purchasing procedure of pitting vendors against each other, for the lowest possible price. I had a new vision for the program and doing what we always did was not acceptable. The new vision worked! The added program complemented our existing operations. It was a tremendous boon to the company. It made and saved the manufacturer millions.

Some twelve years or so later, the persistent, “greasy sales guy” is my business partner and a great friend. He is largely responsible for our success and millions more in revenue. The manufacturer no longer exists, a victim of bankruptcy liquidation. The company for which The Yankee worked during our first encounter has since met the same fate. They’re long gone. (Incidentally, so is the other good print vendor).

The Yankee or Mike, is now at a great, solid, 100+-year-old company. We’re all still together and finding work where we can. We’re still applying those same “Old School” principles — common business courtesy, honesty, efficiency, hard work and loyalty. I still believe we can help good companies grow business.

Now, all we have to do is find at least one good client who expects that kind of service.